Mission is the Strategy: What Gets Lost When We Compare Arts Organizations Without Context
 

Jeremy Reynolds' recent article in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Analysis: Pittsburgh’s ballet sacrificed some artistry to rebuild audiences. Other arts groups should have done the same, makes a compelling case for Pittsburgh Ballet Theatre's audience-building success, and PBT deserves genuine credit for it. But the piece does something that arts journalism often does: it measures organizations against each other without accounting for the most fundamental variable. Their missions. 

PBT's mission is to present extraordinary ballet experiences that give life to the classical tradition while nurturing new ideas. Programming "Dracula," "Cinderella," and "The Wizard of Oz" is a direct expression of that mission. The strategy and the mission are aligned.

But Pittsburgh Public Theater's mission is to provide artistically diverse theatrical experiences that serve, challenge, stimulate, and entertain. A season built around familiar titles and audience-tested stories could be a smart business pivot for PPT, but it would be a departure from what PPT exists to do. The same logic applies across the ecosystem. Organizations whose missions center around presenting new works or challenging materials are making intentional programming decisions in service of a different, equally valid purpose.

A thriving arts ecosystem is not a monoculture. It is a field of organizations doing both the familiar and the challenging, both the classical and the new. When we evaluate them without that context, we don't just misread the data, we risk pressuring organizations to abandon the very commitments that make them worth sustaining.

P.S. It's also worth noting that while this piece was deeply complimentary of Pittsburgh Ballet Theatre, I'm not sure PBT would love the framing, either. Describing their work as "sacrificing artistry" in pursuit of audience growth undersells what they've actually accomplished, which is finding a genuine and intentional alignment between their mission, their programming, and their community.

Signs of Progress at Pennsylvania Creative Industries, formerly Pennsylvania Council on the Arts

On March 26, we joined advocates from across the commonwealth for Pennsylvania Creative Industries' virtual quarterly Council meeting, where we once again raised concerns directly with agency leadership. Our comments stressed how the proposed grant restructuring and elimination of fiscal sponsorships is creating barriers for small arts and culture organizations to receive funding. 

Since that meeting, PCI distributed a survey to current grantees receiving under $100,000 — and we see this as a meaningful sign that the advocacy is working. The survey includes questions about a potential new grant tier for organizations under the $100,000 threshold, and notably, it also asks specifically about fiscal sponsorship.

We appreciate that the concerns raised in the March meeting are being addressed. We will continue to monitor developments closely and report back as this situation evolves. If you are a former grantee and received the survey, we encourage you to respond — your voice matters in this process.

Sign-On Letters for Arts Funding: Statewide Effort Underway

Creative Pennsylvania is coordinating a statewide effort to secure letters of support from members of the General Assembly for a $5 million increase to the grants to the arts line item in the state budget. The letters will be delivered to House Appropriations Chairman Jordan Harris and Senate Appropriations Vice Chairman Vincent Hughes, with copies going to the Governor's office and the Pennsylvania Council on the Arts. 

We are actively engaged in this effort on behalf of our region, and have already distributed templates to all members of the General Assembly serving Southwestern Pennsylvania. We're pleased to share that Sen. Williams and Reps. Kinkead, Mayes, Benham, Powell, Markosek, Venkat, Salisbury, Deasey, Frankel, Pisciottano, and Mazzocco have already signed on. We thank each of them for their leadership and attention to this cause.

We will continue working to secure additional signatures and will keep you informed as the effort develops.

Trump's Budget Proposal Threatens Federal Arts Funding

On April 3, President Trump released his proposed FY27 budget, once again recommending severe cuts to federal domestic agencies, including a renewed push to eliminate the National Endowment for the Arts, the National Endowment for the Humanities, and the Institute of Museum and Library Services. Rather than zeroing out these agencies outright, the proposal allocates minimal funding to each, just enough, as the Administration has stated, to wind down and close their operations.

This is not new ground. The President proposed eliminating the NEA and NEH in his FY26 budget as well. Congress ultimately rejected those cuts, and both agencies received $207 million each in final FY26 funding. That outcome was a direct result of sustained advocacy pressure, and it's a reminder that a presidential budget proposal is exactly that: a proposal. Congress holds the power of the purse, and the path forward runs through your representatives.

You can view the Status of the FY27 Federal Arts Appropriations Cycle in this comprehensive chart, distributed by Americans for the Arts Action Fund. The chart provides a full comparison of proposed and enacted funding levels across key federal arts programs and agencies, from the President's FY26 proposal through his newly released FY27 budget.

Federal Judge Blocks Trump's Order to End Funding for NPR and PBS

A federal judge recently ruled that President Trump's executive order targeting NPR and PBS violated the First Amendment, a significant legal development, but one that Pittsburgh's public media leaders are urging the community not to misread. Both Jason Jedlinski, President and CEO of WQED, and Terry O'Reilly, President and CEO of Pittsburgh Community Broadcasting Corporation, have been clear: this ruling does not restore federal funding for local stations. That funding was rescinded by Congress, not the President, and a court decision about an executive order cannot undo an act of Congress.

This distinction matters. The fight to restore public media funding runs through the legislative branch, not the courts, and it requires sustained pressure on the members of Congress who hold those decisions. Read Terry O'Reilly's full article here.

Other News of Interest:

Fall of Freedom presents May Day 2026 | May 1

Fall of Freedom's May Day is an urgent call to artists and arts institutions to create work — music, theater, exhibitions, comedy, and protest — in solidarity with immigrants' rights organizing and against repression and state violence.

Want to get involved?

Soren DeNiz

Soren DeNiz — a Pittsburgh-based graphic designer, musician, theatre professional, and former Arts Council intern — is channeling their artistic practice into building connection and hope for Pittsburgh's Latinx community. After a successful Valentine's Day project delivering handmade gifts and cards to Latinx neighbors, Soren is organizing a Mother's Day community care initiative — collecting cards and handmade crafts to distribute to Latinx families at local resource centers and congregations. 

To help contributors connect authentically with Spanish-speaking neighbors, Soren is providing suggested Spanish messages for those writing cards. In a moment when many in the community are navigating fear and uncertainty, Soren is using their art to remind neighbors that they are not alone. If you'd like to contribute, reach out to Soren on Instagram to coordinate drop-off or pick-up by Sat., May 9.

Congrats to Miracle Jones

Pittsburgh-based activist and visual artist Miracle Jones was recently announced as the new Executive Director of the Abortion Liberation Fund of PA after a tenure as the Director of Advocacy and Policy at 1Hood Media and the Director of Legislative Affairs for 1Hood Power. We're grateful to Miracle for her years of advocacy in ensuring that artists have a voice in transformative justice. 

Do you know a person or organization worth a spotlight? We'd love to learn more! Use this form to send us their info for consideration in a future newsletter.

Urge Congress to Fund the NEA, NEH, and IMLS

The President's budget is a proposal and Congress decides what actually gets funded. Take two minutes right now to send a message to your U.S. Representative and two U.S. Senators urging them to reject these cuts and protect federal investment in the arts, humanities, and libraries. Americans for the Arts Action Fund has made it easy with a turn-key, customizable message ready to send.
 

Share Your Story: NCAC Amicus Brief in NEA v. Rhode Island Latino Arts

The National Coalition Against Censorship (NCAC) is filing an amicus brief in federal court challenging NEA grant restrictions that prohibited recipients in 2025 from "promoting gender ideology." To build the strongest possible case, NCAC is collecting stories from artists, cultural institutions, and grant recipients who experienced censorship, confusion, or fear as a result of these restrictions. If that includes you or your organization, your story could help protect the freedom of artistic expression for years to come.

We encourage organizations to join the National Council of Nonprofits and Legal Defense Fund in signing onto a national letter opposing these harmful proposed changes.
 

Thanks for helping shape Pittsburgh’s future through advocacy and action,

Patrick Fisher
CEO, Greater Pittsburgh Arts Council

PS. Did someone forward you this newsletter? Sign up now to be part of the movement. New here? Welcome! We send a few different emails. If you’re just here for Advocacy in the Arts, click 'Manage email preferences' below and select 'Advocacy Newsletters.'